A note about Transgender Participation in Sport

While the world is swirling around the potential for participation of transgender athletes in competition, many debates are entering into every aspect of the sports world to provide clarification and fairness all athletes.  In reviewing the requirements being applied to those who have entered competition in sport as a transgender athlete, there have been several policies that have developed and are currently being implemented by the National Collegiate Athletic Association. The policies, though in their incipient stage, will influence much decision making as eligible trans and non-binary athletes enter sport competition with competitors according to their validated gender designation.

Myron Genel, M. D. refers to the difficulties in enacting policy by noting that “clinicians and politicians have struggled with how to integrate transgender individuals”. (1) However, in 2003 initial recommendation were a start to addressing the issue through the development of clinical criteria that can be verified.

Further, guidance regarding the right of a trans/non-binary athlete to participation was provided by 12 years of policy by the National College Athletic Association and its more recent policy clarifications in 2022.  The original “2010 NCAA Policy on Transgender Student-Athlete Participation” included the following:

“The following policies clarify participation of trans student-athletes* undergoing hormonal treatment for gender transition: 1. A trans male (FTM) student-athlete who has received a medical exception for treatment with testosterone for diagnosed gender dysphoria for purposes of NCAA competition may compete on a men’s team but is no longer eligible to compete on a women’s team without changing that team status to a mixed team. 2. A trans female (MTF) student-athlete being treated with testosterone suppression medication for gender dysphoria for the purposes of NCAA competition may continue to compete on a men’s team but may not compete on a women’s team without changing it to a mixed team status until completing one calendar year of testosterone suppression treatment. Trans student-athletes who are not taking hormone treatment related to gender transition may participate in sex-separated sports activities in accordance with their sex assigned at birth. • A trans male (FTM) student-athlete who is not taking testosterone related to gender transition may participate on a men’s or women’s team. • A trans female (MTF) student-athlete who is not taking hormone treatments related to gender transition may not compete on a women’s team. *

(*This policy may also apply to student-athletes who identify as non-binary. The same policy requirements apply to student-athletes who identify as non-binary and wish to compete on a men’s or women’s team.)” (2)

The current policy was updated in 2022 to align with Olympic Movement policy and specify three phases as follows:

“Phase One – 2022 winter and spring championships

For participation in 2022 winter and spring championships, transgender student-athletes must provide documentation to the CSMAS within four weeks before the selections date for their championship. 

The documentation must demonstrate compliance with the 2010 NCAA policy (PDF), which calls for one year of testosterone suppression treatment. It should also document a one-time serum testosterone level that falls below the maximum allowable level for the sport in which the student-athlete is competing within four weeks of championship selections for that sport. This means that student-athletes who have already fulfilled the 2010 NCAA policy need only provide one validated serum testosterone level in this time frame.

Transgender student-athletes who are participating in regular season competition (including conference championships) for the remainder of academic year 2022 remain subject to the 2010 NCAA policy only.

Phase Two – 2022-23 regular season and championships

Beginning Aug. 1, 2022, participation in NCAA sports requires transgender student-athletes to provide documentation that meets the above criteria for the 2010 NCAA policy (PDF), plus meet the sport standard for documented testosterone levels at the beginning of their competition season and again six months later. This means that student-athletes who have already been competing do not need to demonstrate the newly adapted sport-specific testosterone levels for the entire prior year if they are not available.

For participation in NCAA championships, transgender athletes must additionally provide documentation of testosterone levels to the CSMAS with laboratory work completed within four weeks of the championship selections.

Phase Three – 2023-24 full implementation

Beginning Aug. 1, 2023, participation in NCAA sports requires transgender student-athletes to provide documentation that meets the sport-specific standard submitted twice annually (once at the beginning of competition season and the second six months following) for one year. This process will continue annually for eligible student-athletes.

For participation in NCAA championships, transgender athletes must additionally provide documentation of testosterone levels to the CSMAS with laboratory work completed within four weeks of the championship selections.”

Now with guidance from international and national policies that affect sport federations and universities, other entities are providing new decision making in the form of either recognizing gender issues or banning participation altogether. (2)

In studying the issue of transgender/non-binary athletic participation, the position expressed in this article is as follows:

Rachel McKinnon

1.     Student athletes, regardless of their gender orientation, have a right to participate in competition that best represents an accurate definition of their physicality through medical descriptions such as those already presented in current policy.  It is important to note, however, that a standard for sport-specific testosterone levels may not eventually be the only evidence that one is indeed female or male.  Other factors may be required as scientific methods show more accurate testing.

2.     While there is great concern over a perceived unfair advantage that male to female transitioned athletes may have over cisgender female athletes, and evidence, indeed, shows that newly entered athletes have broken many records above other athletes, it is suggested that there will not be a great number of athletes who will make transitions for the purpose of breaking records. These athletes deserve to compete in the proper environment related to their gender.

3.     Given the over 20 years of attention to this topic, it is suggested that sport organizations give due time and patience in addressing these rights and responsibilities to ensure fairness and ultimate benefit to all athletes and avoid a knee-jerk reaction to banning athletes from entering a sport area as a trans/binary athlete.

It has taken a long time for policy to begin to develop to accommodate trans and binary athletes, and there needs to be time for the newer policies to be evaluated and modified.  Simply banning these athletes from competition is not a solution, it is a delaying tactic that will continue to deny participation from a group of athletes who have already made the hard decisions about how they wish to live their lives.

Of course, while policy development has been helpful in directing transgender athletes into their inclusion with appropriate opportunities for competition, this author believes that much more needs to be done on the part of parents and policymakers to ensure that gender transforming methods are carefully and appropriately applied in the first place, and that policies that develop to support a widening class of competitors be accomplished with due consideration of the ultimate safety and risk factors associated with potential misidentification of athletes. 

 References:

1.     Genbel, M. (2017).  Transgender athletes: How can they be accommodated? Current Sports Medicine Reports, 17(1), p 12-13.

2.     National Collegiate Athletic Association (2022). Transgender Student-Athlete Participation Policy. Retrieved August 19, 2022, at https://www.ncaa.org/Transgender%20Student-Athlete%20Participation%20Policy%20-%20NCAA.org.html.

Chasing Dr. Banks: The “Story Behind the Story”

Stepping back from academia during a time of immense personal loss, I decided to channel my energies in a positive direction and fulfill a lifelong dream – writing and publishing a fiction novel. My book, Chasing Dr. Banks, a year-and-a-half in the making, is about a young college professor, who, driven to learn the hidden truth behind suspicious activities in his college, and the dark secrets that haunt his university, pushes too far, and finds his life turned upside-down. Alone, and on the run from sinister forces that seek to silence him, he must rely on his wits and intuition, a lost love, and a few friends and unexpected allies, to save not only his reputation and career, but his very life.

Chasing Dr. Banks, at its heart, is about the consequences that good people might face when confronting unethical or scandalous behavior in higher education.

I have worked at two amazing universities over the course of my career – Texas A&M University and the University of Florida. I respect Texas A&M for its commitment to honor and integrity, and the University of Florida is very near and dear to my heart. I have worked as faculty and in administrative capacities at both universities and count it an honor to have served them. I also have great respect and appreciation for those universities where I received my degrees. I’ve had an amazing career and known and worked with some of the best people on the planet. Sadly, however, over a lifetime in academia, in conducting research for the book, and in speaking with university faculty, staff, and administrators, I am aware of those in higher education whose dishonorable behavior casts a dark shadow over the universities they inhabit.

Having worked as a graduate student assistant, and up through the ranks from assistant to full professor in the fields of sport, recreation, and public health, and later as an administrator who interacted with the highest reaches of the university, my lens is at once both penetrating and expansive. I have learned that scandal and bad behavior are not inherent to a university in a holistic sense (there are no inherently corrupt universities), but are rooted in the pockets and folds of the institution - not unlike what one might find in certain large corporations or bureaucracies. This can be due to compartmentalization, where individual units lack accountability or, as happens in Chasing Dr. Banks, where the university turns a blind eye to the behavior of certain powerful and corrupt faculty who generate large sums of money through various endeavors.

So, at this point I’ll stop lecturing – a habit for us in academia – and dig a bit deeper into some of the ideas and inspiration behind the book. To some of my former colleagues and supervisors, fear not - there is no need to run to the liquor cabinet for a stiff drink before reading further. What I am about to say comes from one place or another, and is not attributable to any specific person or place. Also, ideas for the plots and sub-plots are akin to seeds - ones that I watered and fertilized with my imagination for the sake of fiction, with the intent to grow in a way that would foster enjoyment and entertainment – the primary purpose of my book.

Friends and colleagues who have read Chasing Dr. Banks have made assumptions, and I’m often asked the origin of my ideas. Some have assigned a “real life” identity to certain characters. To that end, I can assure you that all characters in the book are solely a product of my imagination. Certain characters may be imbued with some of the worst human qualities that I have encountered during my life and career, but these qualities do not serve to depict an actual person.  One colleague went so far as to say that he knew the exact circumstances about which I was writing, while still others have said that the book sounds like an autobiography. I assure you that this is not an autobiography. I have never had malicious files planted on my computer, nor have I ever been accused of anything like what Noah endured. I have also never been threatened with termination, nor have I had to run for my life. Despite a meaningful and purposeful career and spotless record, however, I do feel a certain kinship with Noah in that we both have experienced cruelty and subterfuge that goes beyond the pale.

Those of us in academia can be a paranoid bunch, and for good reason. Many of us have seen or experienced some very bad behavior in the work environment. As a good friend and colleague was fond of saying, “This profession is not for the faint of spirit or weak of heart.” I would tend to agree, as I’ve seen my fair share of things I would have preferred to have not known. In conducting research for the book, and in speaking with university faculty, staff, and administrators, I’ve “seen” even more. It is from this perspective that I will share some of the “sparks” that set my imagination afire. 

I thought that it would be fun to take the fears and concerns of my colleagues - some of which have marinated in my subconscious over the course of my education and career - and put them to a story. What if, for example, we in higher education were actually under constant surveillance without our knowledge. Taking that a step further, what if the “watchers” and “listeners” were intent on doing us harm should we say or do the wrong thing in their eyes. I can say that in the real world, faculty and students have had serious suspicions. They have spoken in whispers in offices and meeting rooms, bought and used noise-canceling devices, or left the building so that those whom they believed were spying on them would not learn of matters they sought to keep in confidence.  Also, fueled by suspicion, faculty have gone so far as to consider hiring private investigators to sweep their offices for hidden listening devices. I know that computers are sometimes monitored directly, but as for covert listening devices, it was fun to play with the idea of what if we really were spied upon while we naively went about our daily business in our offices and meeting spaces.   

Some faculty have feared that their supervisors, or perhaps even powerful faculty colleagues with IT connections, would plant malicious files such as child pornography on their computers either while they were out of the office, or when they turned in their old computers for new ones. In conducting research for the book, I learned that some faculty take their laptops and hard drives home with them every night to keep them safe, and plant hidden cameras in their offices out of fear that someone who means them harm might plant malicious files on their computer and frame them for it. Faculty have even taken special precautions, much like Noah did in the book, when returning computers in fear their supervisors would plant malicious files to frame them. What if this fear was justified? The book engages this paranoia in a sub-plot that sets the stage for the twists and turns of the story that follows.

What if, I thought, the bad behavior of those in authority, when left unchecked, morphed into something even worse than the sum of its parts. In Chasing Dr. Banks, people in positions of authority do some very bad things. This is not unlike what I have learned happens in academia. The bad behavior to which I have been privy through my research, and over my career, is of a such a nature as to be both unconscionable and nearly unmentionable. Faculty and administrators having sexual relations with students under their control, administrators belittling and demeaning subordinates with lies they pass off as “jokes,” faculty and administrators engaging in the use of illegal narcotics, powerful faculty creating “cancel culture” by engaging in persuasive misinformation campaigns, administrators and powerful faculty engaged in fraud and misuse of funds, administrators engaged in intimate relations with peers within the university that creates bias in their decision-making, faculty sexualizing female students in the classroom, administrators basing pay raises and promotions on personal favors and selfish motives – are just a few examples. Chasing Dr. Banks draws upon these reprehensible behaviors, and others beyond this list, to form a plot that sets up and reveals the wicked master plan of Noah’s colleagues.  

Although Chasing Dr. Banks is a work of fiction, designed to provide entertainment and a sense of escape, it is hoped that the reader will take from this book a bit more - that bad things do happen to good people, and our institutions of higher learning, much like certain aspects of our society, are on the brink. We are at an inflection point where the qualities of faith, empathy, and integrity are needed now more than ever in higher education leadership. It will take courageous people willing to step forward when the bad behavior of their colleagues and supervisors is known to them, and leadership that is willing to listen and act in a reasoned and selfless manner, to move the needle in the proper direction. This can be summed up in one of my favorite quotes, “Evil prevails when good people do nothing.” I think that Dr. Noah Banks would agree.   

Chasing Dr. Banks can be purchased online from most major book sellers.

NIL deals- the good and the bad

By: JON WILLIS

            After many arguments, it seemed like, last year, the NCAA decreed that athlete could make money from marketing deals. These NIL (name, image, and likeness) deals have already completely changed the game for student-athletes. Less than a year in, athletes in total have made more than 500 million dollars throughout the United States. After athletes were just used to being paid by having free education, this new law by the NCAA has completely changed the game.

            So, the way I look at it, is that there are both positives and negatives to this new era of funding college athletes. The positive aspect is that the athletes, who are the reason that these colleges have millions of dollars flowing into their school, are finally getting compensation for all the work they put into what they are doing. There are some negatives to this as well. Some players are going to do a lot, while others might not make much of anything, and some athletes might start to think that that is unfair, and they deserve similar compensation. These players might start to get egotistical, which can affect their relationship with their team and affect where a player might decide to go for college for a better chance to get a marketing deal. Further, monetary rewards may prove to be a distraction. The universities usually have nothing to do with athletes and their NIL deals, and it could be a distraction to the student athletes with already so much going on in their lives.

            “There’s a lot of concerns I have as this goes forward,” said Nebraska head football coach Scott Frost in a press conference last July. “I am a fan of it because the players deserve it and I think Nebraska football players are in a position to thrive under the new NIL rules.”

            There is obviously a lot of uncertainty about the future of this and how athletes will handle it, but most of the coaches around the country have had similar concerns as Frost. There will be challenges with how students handle this, and we must be ready, but the players deserve it so, of course, it is a good thing. Frost also mentioned more recently that he has almost nothing to do with those NIL deals, as they are a whole separate entity from the football team. To me, the coach's job is to just make sure a player is responsible for these and make sure they have the correct help to help them make the right decisions about how to move forward with this.

            “One negative effect that could come from NIL deals is if students do not meet with their compliance officers first and make sure the deal, they are making is legit, it could mess with their eligibility for their sport,” said Shiloh McCool, a student athlete. “One other negative effect would simply be a time-management issue. Student athletes are already typically busy between classes, practices, games, etc. Adding more work on their plate by making NIL deals could affect their school or sport if they do not manage their time and energy well.”  

            I think this will also continue to impact the transfer portal. We are increasingly seeing the college game, football, looking more like free agency. Players feel they can just go wherever they feel like it after already committing to another college. That is the one negative that I do not think has a chance of being fixed because of how prominent it already is. Athletes will start looking to colleges that have better chances for marketing deals and would only look to those big colleges that would have a chance to make a lot of money. The transfer portal is something I have already thought that the NCAA needs to look at, and these NIL rules have been added to the question marks around the portal.

            Also, this is not just a thing that is affecting players at the DI level, but also the levels below. The opportunities are not as plentiful at the levels below, but even at the DII level, we can see the impact that it is having on student athletes. Shiloh McCool, a redshirt sophomore women’s basketball student athlete, has taken advantage of the new rules along with a few of her fellow teammates by partnering with a clothing store called Still Waters Clothing.

            “So far it has not made an enormous difference in my life personally, but it is cool knowing we have the freedom to make deals and such if we have the opportunity,” McCool said. “The athletic department talked to all the student athletes about the opportunity for NIL deals when it first passed. Then, whenever you can utilize your NIL, we are required to talk to our associate athletic director, Rachael Page, just to make sure everything falls within the rules of NIL usage and to ensure that it will not mess up your athletic eligibility.”

            So even at the DII level, student athletes are having these opportunities to make money and having the proper counseling to make sure they are making smart choices. McCool also mentioned that she and her teammates are donating all the proceeds from their NIL deals to the local elementary schools. So not only is this a good thing for the student athletes to have the ability to make money, but in cases like this, it can lead to the betterment of a community.  

            Now, while there still to this day are a lot of concerns about this, the main point is that this is the right thing to do for athletes. It has been a long time coming, and it gives athletes the ability to build their brand and get ready to try to move forward with their careers, hopefully into professional sports. Universities just must make sure these student athletes have the proper help and instruction from a counselor or someone of that nature, so they know how to do things like their taxes and how to be smart with this.

            I think overall, this is a good thing and will impact colleges and their athletes in a positive way. The big key will just be for both players, coaches, and university staff to continue to be smart about this. It seems that in the first year or so, things are going well, students are still competing hard, and a lot of money and deals have been made. It will be fascinating to see how this will progress just in the next couple of years.

Sources:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2022-03-18/ncaa-nil-deals-help-college-athletes-get-paid

On Thin Ice; The Inequality Between Men and Women’s Hockey in the NCAA.

By: JON WILLIS and THOMAS ORR

            Throughout Division I (DI) athletics, not just hockey, we see vast differences between the treatment, funding, and support of men’s sports compared to women’s sports. The sports you see on TV for the most part, at least on the big networks, heavily favor men’s sports over women’s sports. In this article, we are going to specifically go over the issue with the fact that there are countless colleges that have men’s hockey, but either do not have a women’s team, or the one they do have is a club team that makes the women have to pay an excessive amount of money to be able to compete at a lesser level, separate but not equal.

            An article came out on March 31 by the Michigan Daily about the absence of varsity status by the Michigan Club women’s hockey team. The article reveals that the club team must raise all the money by themselves and must pay the college to use the ice, even though they are at the level of any other DI college women’s hockey team. Michigan is a state that even though it has a strong hockey presence, does not have a single DI women’s hockey team. This season the Men’s team were favorites for the NCAA National Championship with a roster that featured countless NHL prospects on scholarship enjoying the privileges of a fully supported varsity athlete.

            A shocking statistic refers to 60 DI schools that have men’s hockey, while astoundingly only 36 DI schools have women’s hockey. This represents a tremendous inequity. Schools are putting millions of dollars into equipment, video boards, stadiums, football, and other support, but somehow cannot fund a women’s hockey team. They could share these resources with their female counterparts to offset imbalance issues. When schools like current Men’s National Champions, Denver place a substantial portion of their otherwise lesser sport programs into a flagship DI sport like Men’s hockey and do not even field a Women’s team it is hard to imagine how these could meet the balance required by Title IX for opportunities and resources.

            There was another incident other than the Michigan story on just how pervasive the problem is. North Dakota cut their women’s hockey program while Lauren Hennessey, a phenomenal hockey player, was on campus ready to go for the hockey season. It came out of nowhere and was a shock to even the coach who was hosting recruits during the announcement. The program had developed Olympic Athletes and was on the rise after being created to suffice demands of an earlier lawsuit threat. North Dakota went from a program that was using the resources of their incredibly successful Men’s hockey team to support the opportunity for Women’s hockey in a way that was compliant with the spirit of Title IX.

            With North Dakota joining the Michigan Schools and others who are not fielding Women’s hockey the limited scholarships for Women to play NCAA hockey took another blow. Talented women are already limited in playing hockey, because unlike the men, there are no opportunities to play junior hockey in women’s sports. So not only are there 24 less schools available for women’s hockey, but they do not have that option as well. It is shocking to see stories like this, because women deserve the right to have the same opportunities in athletics as men do, yet this is very clearly not equal.

            Schools have found ways to avoid inequality between sports at colleges. Schools have also found ways to circumvent Title IX or used it less ethically to create some sense of perceived balance, usually at the expense of all sexes. Title IX which started to be effective June 23, 1972, was a law passed to prohibit sex-based discrimination in any school that receives federal funding. The law has many distinct aspects on how it is trying to prevent that discrimination, but for clarity, the law says that schools are required to have the same amount of women athletes as men athletes or they are working to become more equal. Schools like the University of Nebraska at Kearney and Northern State University handled the issue by getting rid of Men’s teams to create perceived equity. UNK baseball team was cut to even out the athletes between men and women while NSU cut Men’s golf. With numbers, the inflated rosters of football teams always create issues with numbers. So, if a school has a football program, which takes up significantly more athletes than any other sport, they must have a lot more women’s sports and roster spots made available. This leaves less opportunities for males who do not play varsity football as the largest portion of scholarships would typically be allocated towards football.

            If Title IX was enacted to create equal opportunities for both men and women in sports, then why do we see what we see like we do in hockey? The excuse that people always produce is “money.” While hockey is an expensive sport to support, compared to some others that colleges normally do, it still does not answer the question of how they can support a men’s hockey team, but not a women’s. If a school like Michigan or Denver can chase a championship, they should have the money to pay the luxury tax of supporting female hockey in their state and beyond. When we are breaking down D1 hockey specifically, these colleges can make money, however college athletics lacks agreed upon accounting and reporting practices, so it is simple to show revenue and loss in different manners.

            D1 women’s sports are continuing to become increasingly popular. Nebraska women’s basketball and volleyball sold out every game they held. Every NCAA D1 volleyball and basketball tournament game was broadcasted on an ESPN platform. It is obvious that around the country, the support for women’s athletics is continuing to grow and grow. Nebraska has one D1 Men’s hockey team located at the Omaha campus; however, UNO does not field a Women’s team. Without a doubt we can say, especially in Michigan, which is a hockey state, that they could support a women’s hockey team and draw in a significant amount of money or at least afford to cover it. Nebraska, Colorado, North Dakota, and other states are not sending the right message to young ladies in their states when they provide a division one experience only for the boys.

            Ohio State is one of the D1 schools that have a women’s hockey team and men’s team at the top level. We guarantee, with the hatred between Michigan and Ohio State, if those two every played a hockey game together if Michigan ends up getting an actual women’s team, that game would be sold out and provide hope for a new generation of female athletes. The 24 schools not offering women’s hockey are missing opportunities for women, and it continues to show that while there have been improvements between men’s and women’s sports, that this is still an issue and still something we as a country still need to continue to work on with the leadership of the NCAA.

Sources:

https://www.michigandaily.com/sports/as-womens-hockey-grows-michigans-absence-is-glaring/?fbclid=IwAR1s1A9I9ljPD4YN-J277bddisuKcxnjlLXbNdBM73dYEnSJsf6pOjjl5Vs

https://www.ncsasports.org/mens-hockey/colleges#:~:text=Colleges%20with%20Division%201%20hockey,Hockey%20East%2C%20NCHC%20and%20WCHA.

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/tix_dis.html

The Spectacle of the NFL Draft

By GRANT TIGHE

tighegd@lopers.unk.edu

The NFL Draft is arguably the biggest non-game sporting event of the year in American sports. It was always held at Radio City Music Hall in New York City until 2014, but now the NFL rotates it between host cities which have hauled in $500 million in economic impact since this change. The seven-round event is broadcasted on multiple stations including ESPN, ABC, and the NFL Network. There is always a spectacle made of the top players in the green room and cameras in the in-house draft parties for them.

            The NFL Draft is clearly superior to the three other major sports in basketball, baseball, and hockey. Why is that?

            In the NFL, there is no minor league associated with it that players may go to develop. It’s NFL or bust. The MLB has Minor League Baseball, the NBA has the G League, and the NHL has the American Hockey League.

            In the MLB, there are 40 rounds, and every player starts off in the minor leagues to develop before getting to the majors. Only 66% of first-round picks make it to play for a major league team and from 1981-2020 17.6% of drafted players made the major league.

            Due to the smaller rosters, the NBA Draft only has two rounds. Many top players start and play significant minutes for their teams immediately, but a portion of the players sign two-way contracts that make them play for both their G-league affiliate and NBA team. Due to the shorter draft and fewer players drafted, the NBA Draft can be less exciting than the NFL Draft.

            The seven-round NHL Draft is probably the closest thing to the NFL as many of the first-round selections can be on the team right away. It also differs from the NFL as many players selected in the later rounds may opt to stay where they are currently playing. If they don’t like where they are drafted, they don’t have to sign a contract. The American Hockey League can also take in some of the players and develop them as well.

NFL teams don’t have a minor league they can send players to, they either make their team or they cut them. This can make drafting players more exciting since most of them will be on the team for at least their first year. The later rounds can also mean something in the NFL Draft, as there are many examples of players drafted in the later rounds being all-stars such as George Kittle, Tom Brady, Tyreek Hill, etc.

Hutchinson with Michigan in 2021

The NFL Draft also comes at a time of the year when there are not a whole lot of major sporting events on television. It comes a month after the major college sporting season ends with March Madness. The NBA Playoffs are just getting started, the MLB season is in its early stages and it’s the end of the NHL season when people are getting ready for the playoffs. It also comes at the midway point of the NFL offseason at 105 days into the 238-day offseason between the Super Bowl and Opening Night.

Lastly, football is the highest viewed and most popular American sport. Super Bowl XLIX in 2015 was one of the highest viewed sporting events ever with 114.4 million viewers. For comparison, Game Six of the Bulls vs Jazz in 1998 drew 35.9 million viewers, MLB is at recording some of its lowest ratings ever in the history of the sport and the highest-rated NHL game drew 8.72 million viewers in the 2019 Stanley Cup final between the Blues and the Bruins.

Football is dominant for viewership in America right now and it is clear in the extravagant NFL Draft. It generates months of buzz and creates many jobs for insiders and experts like Mel Kiper, Todd McShay and Daniel Jeremiah who constantly scout players and create mock drafts. There is no other sport that can compare to it and it is evident when people watch that the NFL Draft is different than all the other American sports drafts.

FROM RUSSIA; WITHOUT LOVE: THE CASE FOR VACATING MEDALS AND BANNING RUSSIA FROM THE OLYMPICS.

By: JON WILLIS, LYNN JAMIESON, BAYLOR HELMUTH AND THOMAS ORR

When you think of the Olympics, what do you think of? It is common to view the Olympics as a time of unity during a sacred time every couple years that brings people from all walks of life together to compete and show the world what they are made of. The Olympics allow a time to put aside differences and come together to show that we are all people on the same planet. When a war breaks out during this period of time, the motive of that country to start war is called into question whether that country is really committed to the ideals of the Olympics.

Noting the buildup of troops along the Ukrainian and previous takeover of Crimea, why has Russia been allowed to compete in any world sporting events any time recently? Being banned from Olympic competition is not new judging from the banning of South African due to its apartheid policies. That ban was lifted after apartheid was abolished. It seems that Russia war policies would effect a complete ban on Olympic participation. Both apartheid and waging war violate the spirit of the Olympics so to reward a country with Olympic Glory seems antithetical to the entire concept of the games themselves.

War as a policy is difficult to understand. Why do we feel the need to fight? We are all people who live on this Earth, and there seems to be no point to the accumulated death toll occurring in any war. What Russia is doing right now to Ukraine however, is a dangerous act of aggression from a leader that does not seem fit to be running his country. Vladmir Putin, who is a dictator and has constantly threatened war against other countries is causing terror not only in people worldwide but also among Russian citizens. The Russian invasion of several cities in the Ukraine not only is a problem for the country, but it also threatens any country that speaks out against it. Nuclear threats make this a world problem.

So what does this have to do with sports? It is creating a bad image for Russia, resulting in athletes from Russia being kicked out of any world athletic competition. A lot of these athletes and even people who live in the country of Russia disagree with what Putin is doing, and they are paying the price for it. Alexander Ovechkin, a very popular Russian hockey player has lost significant sponsorship from CCM (a hockey equipment company) and has faced criticism.  Young athletes from both the Ukraine and Russia who are playing in the United States have very uncertain futures. Russia is terrorizing Ukraine during a time that was supposed to be about peace, and threatening the rest of the world while the Olympics were still ongoing. That is leading to them continuing to lose supporters from around the world, and continuing to grow tensions. If things like this keep up, world sporting events may start to decline. How can we have events like the Olympics if we end up going to another World War?

Oleg Stoyanovskiy - Wikipedia

Creator: Steffen Prößdorf | Credit: Steffen Prößdorf

Copyright: Steffen Prößdorf

Now the question is for potential punishments. We believe that Russia should be kicked out of any global sporting event and stripped of any medals or titles that they may have won. What they are doing is against the code of the Olympics and any national competition, and we can not continue to stand for it. This should not just extend to when the conflict with Ukraine ends however, Russia should not be allowed to compete until someone other than Vladmir Putin is in charge of the country. He is a ruthless dictator, raging war wherever he seems fit, and that doesn’t seem like the kind of representation we want in things like is this harsh? No. A strong consequence to these actions is something we need to do if we actually believe in what the Olympics stand for. In essence, Putin would be banned for life and any country he led would be as well. This rule should be ubiquitous in that others who replicate such actions in the future would know these consequences.

Nikol Rodomakina - 2013 IPC Athletics World

Fanny Schertzer

We have seen situations like this before. In 1936, during world war two, people began to protest that Germany should not be allowed to compete in the Olympics because of the debacle that was going on with the Nazi Germany. There have been other instances where Olympics have been cancelled or boycotted. The 1916, 1940, and 1944 Olympics were cancelled due to the World War’s. Germany and Japan were banned from the Olympics in 1948. Throughout history, countries have boycotted Olympics due to what other countries are doing. 65 nations stayed home in 1980 and three countries boycotted in 1964. This proves that countries do not want to compete when a country like Russia is doing what they are doing. Most countries attempt to uphold the values of the Olympics, and it shows with these past cancellations and boycotts.

Now Russia is already being excluded from sporting events so far. Even the athletes that are allowed to compete aren’t allowed to compete for Russian sponsors. Russian has been barred from international ice skating, skiing, basketball, track, and some tennis events. They are not allowed to compete in the world figure skating championships, the CHL, and the World Games. The international basketball and volleyball federation have already suspended them from competition so they will not be allowed to compete in the World Cup. This has all only happened ever since the war with Ukraine began. People and major corporations are already taking action and Russia is having to deal with the consequences.

For the longest time, the Olympics and other international sporting events have always held up the standards of bringing people together and not fighting. Russia is clearly going against the values of that, and therefore, they will have to continue to deal with punishments. A fervent hope is that maybe one day everyone in this world can just appreciate what we have and we can all come together in sport without argument, fighting, and things of that nature.

Sources

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-movement-to-boycott-the-berlin-olympics-of-1936.

Kennedy, Lesley. “6 Times the Olympics Were Boycotted.” History.com, A&E Television Networks, 26 July 2021, https://www.history.com/news/olympic-boycotts.

Author, No. “Russia Is Banned from More Sports Events as Sanctions Mount.” Https://Www.inquirer.com, The Philadelphia Inquirer, 2 Mar. 2022, https://www.inquirer.com/sports/russia-sports-ban-ice-skating-ukraine-war-20220301.html.

The Olympics and Russia

Like all sporting events through the years, the Summer Olympic Games have changed dramatically, sometimes for the better and sometimes not.

Growing up, I always viewed the Games as something that showcased the purest form of athleticism. While the Olympics did not allow professional athletes, it brought together the best of the best amateur athletes from around the world. It was a showcase for the less popular spectator sports like track and field, swimming, gymnastics, etc. Notice I said less popular spectator sports, not less important sports.

Back in the day, it was a way to find out about people like Bruce Jenner and Mark Spitz. It often rallied a country together as people forgot about political affiliation and focused on being united and cheering on our country’s representatives. In short, it was sports for all the right reasons as Olympic athletes were not being labeled spoiled brats like the professionals because of the huge salaries that they had begun to reel in.

Some moments have become nearly bigger than The Games themselves, such as the Miracle on Ice of the 1980 Winter Olympics when the United States stunned Russia to win the gold medal.

To be fair, there was still a lot of politics at play, back in the day, as countries threatened to boycott the Olympics as a show of power and a few actually did. There were a few doping scandals that also became THE story of the Games. With all that, there still seemed to be an innocence to the Games as America would routinely send amateur athletes to shine on the world’s stage.

That has certainly changed through the years as America now sends professionals to the international stage. With commercialism and the advent of this thing called social media, that innocence has now taken a back seat to egos and entitlement.

There are many athletes who still shine brilliantly as they work towards qualifying for the Olympics. Yet, it seems there are others who use the Games as a platform for their beliefs on everything from politics to sexuality to human rights. Some decline offers to participate in the Games because it doesn’t fit into their schedule or worse yet as a sign of protest because of some sort of perceived slight. That does nothing to bring our country together like the good old days, instead becoming another agent of divisiveness.

I am not a historian when it comes to the Olympics. I know there were plenty of things at play behind the scenes that a young boy was oblivious to. I just knew at the time that the Games were a chance to watch phenomenal athletes that weren’t in the NFL or the NBA and on TV every week.

When I think of the Summer Games, the sports that most quickly come to mind are track and field, and swimming. Interestingly enough, this past summer those particular sports featured athletes with ties to my home state (South Dakota), and even my hometown (Aberdeen). Needless to say, that makes watching the Olympics even more riveting.

As we all get ready for another round of the Winter Olympics, let’s hope that the focus is on the athletes who have worked hard to get there and not on issues like COVID, politics or some form of Skate Gate.

Maybe some form of pure competition between athletes most of us have never heard of is too much to ask for these days, but I for one would like to just sit back and watch the world’s best go head-to-head just for the pure joy of sport and pride of country. It’s really what the Games should be all about.

MLB is (again) destroying their product

By: JON WILLIS

            Major League Baseball has been a sport that has been slowly dying. There are many parts to why baseball might be a dying sport, but one thing is for sure, they definitely are not helping. Baseball has been a sport that has been slowly losing popularity for a couple of reasons. The big ones are they are not adapting to the youth, it is a sport that some consider boring and not a lot happening, and they are doing things like they are with this lockout. The MLB owners and MLB players association are currently not having any operations as they bicker over silly things.

            The joke has always been with these things happening that it’s billionaires vs millionaires. Now why that might be funny, it is not 100% false. The average MLB player in 2021 earned an average income of 4.17 million dollars and a median income of 1.1 million dollars. The average salary for a U.S. citizen is roughly 51,000 dollars. So I know this might sound harsh, but these players who are complaining about money are really already set up pretty nicely in life, at least a lot nicer than the average citizen.

            Now I know I am bashing the players early on, but it really does come down to the owners. The owners continually think that this is just all about money when really there is a lot more to it than that. The owners initiated the lockout and with Rob Manfred, the commissioner of baseball, announcing the first two series of the season have been cancelled, it is now impacting a lot more than just the players. I want to add by the way that when Manfred had his press conference where he announced this, he had a big old smile on his face which really just showed where baseball is at this point in our time.

            So let’s go over what each side wants just to get a better understanding. The players basically want more guarantees of money. The MLBPA wanted to increase the competitive balance tax threshold to 238 million, and was seeking an 85 million dollar bonus for pre-arbitration players. Some things they did want were already agreed upon with owners. There will now be a universal DH, and an expanded playoffs. The owners originally wanted 14 teams, but they eventually agreed on 12. Now those are the basics of what the players want, I know there is a lot more to it, but for this article that’s the basis on what we will go off of.

            So how do we fix this? Talks have been going on for a couple of weeks now, and it is being reported that really no progress is happening. Players have also come out and said that the owners really hadn’t started talking negations until like a week before that March 1st deadline. That’s the first issues there. The owners and the players should have been talking since the season ended. Everyone and their mom knew that the players wanted to change some things, so why were talks not started earlier? The next thing that needs to happen is compromising, and that is on both sides. The players need to realize they are already set for life on a professional salary, and need to be ok with not making as much money as they are asking for. If you’re the owners, you need to realize that these players are the one actually on the field making money for you and for the team. Both sides need to not be so hard nosed on what they want and be willing to compromise.

            I really do think both sides, the players and the owners are being extremely selfish right now. The players are saying that playing and not getting what they want is hurting them, but I don’t think they realize the people they are hurting by participating in this lockout. Each team has concession workers, field managers, security, employees, broadcasters and more that are currently unemployed that rely on baseball to make a living. Last, and most importantly, they are hurting the fans. When it comes down to it, sports in general is an entertainment business. You could not have a baseball league without the fans. Fans want desperately to watch baseball, and they are stabbing those fans in the back by being selfish and not figuring this out. I am referring to both the players and the owners by the way.

            One thing I do hope comes out of this is that college baseball grows in popularity. I hope ESPN and other networks start to put college baseball on their airwaves because you don’t see those problems in college baseball and it’s very high quality competition. This lockout continues to hurt baseball as basketball and football are continuing to dominate in the most popular sports in America. In 2022, football had the biggest viewership in America at 38.8% with basketball at 15.3% and baseball/softball at 14.8%. Baseball used to be “America’s sport,” and now it is in the rear view mirror.

            If baseball wants any chance of keeping MLB popular and relevant, they need to figure this lockout out. Baseball has a lot of work to do anyways to keep the sport popular anyways, which I could write a whole other article about, so they need to compromise and figure this out. This lockout is hurting a lot of people, most of which aren’t actually in this lockout, and the MLB needs to figure it out because that’s what the fans deserve.

Sources-

https://en.as.com/en/2021/10/08/mlb/1633685987_178363.html#:~:text=According%20to%20recent%20data%2C%20MLB,shows%20a%20totally%20different%20picture.&text=The%20average%20salary%20of%20an,to%20%244.17%20million%20a%20year.

https://policyadvice.net/insurance/insights/average-american-income/

https://www.mlb.com/news/mlb-mlbpa-cba-negotiations-update

https://sportsbrowser.net/most-popular-sports-in-america/

The Olympics, and the changes, some better, some not so

Like all sporting events through the years, the Summer Olympic Games have changed dramatically, sometimes for the better and sometimes not.

Growing up, I always viewed the Games as something that showcased the purest form of athleticism. While the Olympics did not allow professional athletes, it brought together the best of the best amateur athletes from around the world. It was a showcase for the less popular spectator sports like track and field, swimming, gymnastics, etc. Notice I said less popular spectator sports, not less important sports.

Back in the day, it was a way to find out about people like Bruce Jenner and Mark Spitz. It often rallied a country together as people forgot about political affiliation and focused on being united and cheering on our country’s representatives. In short, it was sports for all the right reasons as Olympic athletes were not being labeled spoiled brats like the professionals because of the huge salaries that they had begun to reel in.

Some moments have become nearly bigger than The Games themselves, such as the Miracle on Ice of the 1980 Winter Olympics when the United States stunned Russia to win the gold medal.

To be fair, there was still a lot of politics at play back in the day as countries threatened to boycott the Olympics as a show of power and a few actually did. There were a few doping scandals that also became THE story of the Games. With all that, there still seemed to be an innocence to the Games as America would routinely send amateur athletes to shine on the world’s stage.

That has certainly changed through the years as America now sends professionals to the international stage. With commercialism and the advent of this thing called social media, that innocence has now taken a back seat to egos and entitlement.

There are many athletes who still shine brilliantly as they work towards qualifying for the Olympics. Yet, it seems there are others who use the Games as a platform for their beliefs on everything from politics to sexuality to human rights. Some decline offers to participate in the Games because it doesn’t fit into their schedule or worse yet as a sign of protest because of some sort of perceived slight. That does nothing to bring our country together like the good old days, instead becoming another agent of divisiveness.

I am not a historian when it comes to the Olympics. I know there were plenty of things at play behind the scenes that a young boy was oblivious to. I just knew at the time that the Games were a chance to watch phenomenal athletes that weren’t in the NFL or the NBA and on TV every week.

When I think of the Summer Games, the sports that most quickly come to mind are track and field, and swimming. Interestingly enough, this past summer those particular sports featured athletes with ties to my home state (South Dakota), and even my hometown (Aberdeen). Needless to say, that makes watching the Olympics even more riveting.

As we all get ready for another round of the Winter Olympics, let’s hope that the focus is on the athletes who have worked hard to get there and not on issues like COVID, politics or some form of Skate Gate.

Maybe some form of pure competition between athletes most of us have never heard of is too much to ask for these days, but I for one would like to just sit back and watch the world’s best go head-to-head just for the pure joy of sport and pride of country. It’s really what the Games should be all about.